Has phase-detection autofocus for videos. Canon EOS R6. Canon EOS RP. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Canon EOS R6.
The Differences That Matter The first difference worth mentioning, of course, is the price tag…. about $900 difference, if the current prices listed are any indication (7D at about $1599 at Amazon and the 5D Mark II at about ). Since we’re looking at a couple of cameras that have the build quality for professional use, with magnesium alloy bodies, full HD video capabilities, top notch
The Canon EOS 6D Mark II has a full-frame sensor size, which gives it an advantage over the 90D’s APS-C sensor size. This larger sensor size allows for better image quality and low-light performance. Additionally, the 6D Mark II has a higher DXOMARK score for the sensor, reaching 85 compared to the 90D’s score of 58.
Canon 5D Mark IV has the awesome image quality, really good auto-focus, good high ISO performance, but only 7 fps and for the same pixels your subject is further away. 7D Mark II is 2 times cheaper, not as good image quality, but at 10 fps it's very good for birds in flight and other action shots , provided the light is good.
On the other side, the Nikon D810 has a better image sensor (36.3MP vs 30.4MP), has a better battery life ( 1200 shots per battery charge vs 900), and costs less than the 5D Mark IV which may be more adequate for some users. Overall, I think that the Canon 5D Mark IV is better, but either way, feel free to choose the one that you find the best
has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Canon EOS 6D. Canon EOS 760D. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. has a microphone input. Canon EOS 6D. Canon EOS 760D. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack.
uPLgK. 59 223 305 132 418 376 187 0 306
canon 5d mark iv vs 6d mark ii image quality